|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
GENEVA (ILO News) – Economic turbulence largely due
to credit market turmoil and rising oil prices could spur an increase
in global unemployment by an estimated 5 million persons in 2008, the
International Labour Office (ILO) said today in its annual Global
Employment Trends report (GET) 1/. The new projection for 2008 is in contrast to 2007, a
watershed year in which sound global GDP growth – of more than
5 per cent –, led to a “stabilization” of global labour
markets with more people in work, a net increase of 45 million new
jobs and only a slight increase in the number of people unemployed, to
a total of 189.9 million persons worldwide. Significantly, the ILO report noted that the reduction
in the growth in developed economies attributed to credit market
turmoil and higher oil prices so far had been “compensated for in
the rest of the world”, especially in Asia,
where economic and job growth remained strong. However,
the ILO report warned that an expected slowdown in growth during 2008
could increase the global unemployment rate to 6.1 per cent, with a
resulting absolute increase of at least 5 million unemployed
worldwide. ·
Global economy
growth of 5.2 per cent created an estimated 45 million new jobs in
2007, but failed to have any significant impact on the growth of
unemployment. Overall, 61.7 per cent of the global population of
working age – or an estimated 3 billion people – were
employed in 2007. Although the global unemployment rate remained
virtually constant at 6 per cent, that meant an estimated 189.9 million
people, compared to 187 in 2006, were unemployed worldwide in 2007 2/. ·
Despite growth in
the economy and jobs, the worldwide deficit in decent jobs – especially
for the poor – is “massive”. The ILO said five out of 10
people in the world are in vulnerable employment, either contributing
family workers or own-account workers with a higher risk of being
unprotected. In developing countries these two categories are most
likely to work informally and hence have jobs that leave them
vulnerable to poverty and risks such as low earnings, dangerous
working conditions and lack of health insurance. The ILO said an
estimated 487 million workers – or 16.4 per cent of all workers –
still don’t earn enough to lift themselves and their families above
the US$1 per person, per day poverty line while 1.3 billion workers
– 43.5 per cent – still live below the US$2 per day
threshold. ·
The report also
underlined that the service sector continued to grow during 2007,
further surpassing agriculture as the world’s most prevalent source
of employment. The service sector now provides 42.7 per cent of
the world’s jobs, compared to agriculture which provides 34.9 per
cent. The industrial sector, which had seen a slight downward trend
between 1997 and 2003, has continued a rather slow upward trend in
recent years, representing 22.4 per cent of global jobs. The report said East
Asia appeared to be on its way to becoming a middle income region,
as sustained productivity growth had increased incomes and helped lift
millions of people out of poverty. The ILO said the estimated share of
East Asian workers living
with their families below the US$2 per day poverty line dropped to
35.6 per cent today from 59.1 per cent 10 years ago, while the percent
living below US$1 per day had decreased to 8.7 per cent from 18.8 per
cent over the same period. Sub-Saharan
The report also noted that although the Middle
East saw a considerable increase in the employment-to-population
ratio the share of people of working age who were employed increased
from 46 per cent in 1997 to 50.1 per cent in 2007. At the same
time, the Mr. Somavia said “What is apparent is that economic
progress doesn’t automatically translate into new and decent jobs.
This shows once again that labour market policies must be at the
centre of macroeconomic policies to ensure that economic growth is
inclusive and that development involves good, decent work. The current
economic situation is therefore cause for significant concern, and the
ILO will monitor developments closely over the coming year.” 1/
Global Employment Trends 2008. International
Labour Office, 2/
Differences from earlier estimates are due to revisions of the
IMF estimates of GDP growth used in the model as well as revisions in
the labour market information used. Sophy Fisher
Laetitia Dard |
||||