
Address
by Mr. Pedro Daniel Weinberg, Director of Cinterfor/ILO,
at the opening ceremony of the 36th Meeting of the Technical Committee
La Antigua, Guatemala, 28 to 30 July of 2003
Lic. Víctor
Moreira, Minister of Labour and Social Security of Guatemala,
Members of the Board of Directors of INTECAP,
Lic. María Ledvia Berganza, Manager of INTECAP,
Lic. Jorge Gallardo, Assistant Manager of INTECAP,
Mr. Trevor Riordan, IFP/Skills, ILO,
Ladies and gentlemen,
First of all, on
behalf of Mr. Juan Somavía, Director General of the International
Labour Office, and Mr. Agustín Muñoz, Regional Director
for Latin America and the Caribbean, I would like to convey to you a
very cordial welcome to the thirty sixth Meeting of the Cinterfor/ILO
Technical Committee. Through it we express the Organisation's recognition
to the representatives of Member States of the Americas and Spain on
the ILO Governing Body that have accepted our convocation to debate
here at Antigua, Guatemala, subjects of concern to vocational training
bodies in the region, and to examine the Report of Activities 2001-2001
that I am submitting for your consideration in my capacity of Director
of Cinterfor/ILO.
Our Director General
and Regional Director would also like to express their gratitude to
the authorities and people of Guatemala for their hospitality and warm
welcome, as well as the facilities they have provided for holding the
event. In particular, to the Technical Institute for Training and Productivity
(INTECAP), its authorities and personnel, the heartfelt thanks of the
ILO, and of Cinterfor/ILO in particular.
From your analysis,
contributions and suggestions, the ILO Director General expects to draw
on this occasion guidelines to design short and medium-term tasks for
the development of training in the Iberian American Region to be conducted
by Cinterfor.
To begin with, I
should like to share with you some of the ideas that have prevailed
in recent years. Globalisation has been predominant in the political
picture, as well as in power and finance. In the last few decades, this
phenomenon has opened national and international markets to growing
competition, that has no doubt been enhanced by the force of information
and communications technologies.
It is evident that
the process of globalisation has generated greater wealth and welfare;
but many feel that despite this, inequalities and social exclusion persist.
In other words, there are reasons for concern in a situation where the
benefits of development and welfare are delayed. The ILO has decided
to face this challenge by promoting equitable development and a globalisation
that leaves nobody out. That is the sense of the Decent Work Programme
that the Organisation is promoting.
Decent work is a
forceful instrument for picking the way and the contribution the ILO
can make for achieving the objectives adopted by the United Nations
in its Millennium Declaration. The four strategic objectives adopted,
that are also the dimensions making up the concept of Decent Work, are
employment, entitlements, protection and dialogue. They are an updated
expression of the Organisation's mandate and a development strategy
responding to the most urgent cravings of men and women nowadays. We
are persuaded that work is of the greatest importance for all people
everywhere, and a decisive aspect of human existence.
The challenge for
the ILO is to devise development processes contemplating the generation
of employment in sufficient quantity and quality. Narrowing the current
shortfall of decent work is the unavoidable duty of our contemporary
societies.
Ladies and gentlemen,
faced with such challenges, the role of vocational training is not only
ratified but reinforced and diversified. Furthermore, we think that
vocational training is both a pre-requisite for providing decent jobs
for all, and an integral part of the very concept of decent work.
Along these lines
of thought, we justly value the efforts that have been made in the region
of the Americas centring on the tasks of Cinterfor/ILO and focusing
on the role of training for the promotion of decent work.
Thus, analysis and
studies have been carried out in this connection. Seminars, technical
meetings and workshops have been held at national, sub-regional and
regional level, jointly organised by vocational training institutes
and the Centre, with the support of the ILO regional and world structures,
that have made important, innovative contributions. For that purpose,
the ILO has provided technical support through its regional units and
relevant services at headquarters.
As a rule, most
development and growth strategies do not duly take into account educational
and vocational training needs, despite the fact that the overwhelming
majority of workers and persons living in poverty have no access to
training opportunities.
We must consequently
acknowledge that the role of vocational training is not circumscribed
to the attention of the more dynamic and modern sectors of the economy;
nor is it a safety net for men and women living in poverty and in conditions
of daily vulnerability. The alternative cannot be - must not be - designing
two types of policies and strategies: a vocational training for some
and a "productivist" vocational training for others. The kind
of training demanded by our contemporary economies and societies is
that required at this moment in history, that may contribute to our
countries' overall efforts for achieving greater social equity and integration
with higher levels of productivity and competitiveness. Nowadays, vocational
training should also be capable of managing not only the knowledge of
persons but that of productive organisations, and local, national, sub-regional
and regional levels. To sum up, vocational training -says the ILO Director
General- is essential to improve people's productivity, income, and
equitable access to greater and better employment opportunities.
Training is therefore
acquiring predominant importance on the ILO agenda. This is evident
both in the role it has been ascribed in the decent work programme in
general, and in the different ways it intervenes in the Organisation's
technical co-operation schemes intended to raise the levels of competitiveness
of economies and to overcome the different forms of social exclusion
and the alarming levels of poverty that exist nowadays.
The ILO commitment
is also manifest in other spheres, namely in international labour standards.
As you are aware, the Organisation is currently reviewing its Recommendation
150 on Development of Human Resources and Training. This has already
been discussed at the International Labour Conferences of 2001 and 2003,
and has been included in the agenda for next year.
In 2004, the ILO
Member States shall adopt a new text for this Recommendation, that is
supposed to guide future developments in training. In this respect I
should like to convey to you all our satisfaction with the progress
made so far. And we are doubly satisfied because on the one hand, discussions
have so far ratified the timeliness of having reopened the debate at
the highest level within the Organisation. And on the other hand, because
the subjects incorporated do not differ much from the progress made
in training in the Iberian American region. The new approaches that
are being considered in connection with the review of Recommendation
150 are matters that, in daily theory and practice, have already been
postulated and tried out by the vocational training institutions in
the region.
The current prospects
and developments of certain topics are proof of this. I mean - among
other things - issues such as lifelong training, social dialogue, the
participation of employers' and workers' organisations, employability,
training for entrepreneurship, training and certification by competencies,
strengthening the institutionality of training, a concern with youth
enmployment, the incorporation of a gender dimension to programmes and
policies, etc.
For all these reasons
I call on you all - who are responsible for vocational training in the
region - to take active part in the preparatory work and in the debates
at the Ninety Second International Labour Conference, scheduled for
July 2004.
By your leave, I
shall now proceed to refer all but briefly to some of the many advances
made in training through the action of Ministries of Labour and Education,
and above all, that of specialised institutions, in the region of the
Americas.
I should like to
underline the efforts made to build up the institutionality of training,
both regarding processes of institutional modernisation and transformation,
and the generation of new spaces for participation and social dialogue
in training and the inclusion of a gender perspective in it.
I shall only quote
two examples. The first one refers to the adoption by training institutes
of systems for quality management. This is one of the most noteworthy
developments in recent years: certification by international standards
of national institutions, operational units at state, province or sectoral
level, training centres and processes. Such facts are eloquent proof
of the commitment of VT institutions with the provision of good quality,
relevant services. The second example are the many innovations that
are taking place in the management of training bodies and programmes.
I mean by this management at local level, sectoral level, bipartite
management, regional management, the increasingly frequent inclusion
of training in collective bargaining, in national agreements and pacts,
etc.
Secondly, we ascribe
great importance to the efforts being made by some countries to rethink
and reorganise training within the parameters of a lifelong education.
Considerable human and financial resources are being devoted to that
purpose and some ambitious projects are being undertaken to bring about
an aspiration: ongoing training as the right of all persons. Ascribing
institutional funds is an obligation for governments, and making that
possible is a task for all societies.
A third inescapable
aspect is meeting (sometimes foretelling) the demands for integrated
productive development. In just a few years, a very remarkable thing
has happened throughout the region. A significant number of vocational
training centres, apart from their traditional function of delivering
courses, also provide technological information services, offer technical
assistance and consulting support, carry out applied research, implement
quality certification services for products and services, etc. They
do it all in the conviction of giving an integral response to the needs
of working men and women, firms and enterprises, productive fabrics,
economic sectors and so forth. A change can be perceived in the way
many training bodies conceive their task. Many of them are beginning
to realise that their responsibility does not end when they hand out
certificates for the courses they have imparted. Quite the contrary:
they are becoming involved with developing various production management
techniques, like the creation of enterprises and assistance to graduates
by means of enterprise incubators, business nurseries, industrial areas,
technological parks, productive chains, etc.
The fourth and last
item I should like to mention in this brief enumeration is training
and certification by competencies. In scarcely more than five years,
the training approach based on occupational competencies has become
widespread, and practically all countries have undertaken processes
of institutional transformation and technical-teaching redesign for
adopting it. Revamping training programmes around performance on the
job has made it necessary to restructure training in terms of current
production and labour processes, and according to the requirements of
the realm of work. The transition from training programmes based on
"skills" to curricula conceived in terms of "competencies"
has facilitated the recognition of the diverse aptitudes and know-how
of men and women, and has led to an admirable process of institutional
reengineering that we fully appreciate.
I should like to
conclude this message by briefly referring to Cinterfor/ILO. To our
mind, the Centre must be seen as the result of a successful strategic
alliance between the ILO Member States of the Iberian American region
and the ILO itself. The ILO specialised bodies of the region in their
various forms together with Headquarters have shaped this initiative,
that has several positive traits.
It is an initiative
in which all countries of the region and Spain have taken part, and
has been based from its beginnings on an original conception of technical
co-operation, namely, the promotion of horizontal collaboration. No
less important, it is an undertaking that has been growing and consolidating
through the years.
The region and the
ILO itself have in the past seen other initiatives of wide impact, but
very few that have achieved such permanence and sustainability. And
allow me to insist that the success of this undertaking lies in the
formulas that the countries and the ILO have found to consolidate their
commitments in the field of vocational training.
In consequence,
Cinterfor/ILO cannot be seen merely as an initiative operating from
Montevideo, Republic of Uruguay. In order to exist, the Centre has had
to reach every corner of the Americas and Spain where co-operation activities
are under way. The life of Cinterfor/ILO rests upon the striving of
the men and women who work in vocational training institutions, in the
organisations responsible for training policies and in all ILO operational
units and projects in the region, ILO services at headquarters and throughout
the world.
Ladies and gentlemen:
on behalf of our Director General and Regional Director I call upon
you to redouble our efforts for the welfare of the peoples and the success
of the economies of the Iberian American region. The ILO will continue
to support insofar as possible this regional collective effort. We therefore
expect vocational training institutions to continue to do the same.
We shall look forward
to the pronouncement of this 36th Meeting of the Technical Committee
in order to respond ever more closely to what is expected from us by
the men and women of the Iberian American region, and specially by its
vocational training bodies, and the employers' and workers' organisations
of Member States of the ILO here represented. And also to find out whether
Cinterfor/ILO continues to be a suitable and necessary instrument for
the training and development of the human resources of these countries.