GB.340/INS/19/decisions
Decisions on the reports of the Officers of the Governing Body concerning representations made under article 24 of the ILO Constitution
(Private sitting of the Governing Body)
1. Representation alleging non-observance by Chile of the Old-Age Insurance (Industry, etc.) Convention, 1933 (No. 35), and the Invalidity Insurance (Industry, etc.) Convention, 1933 (No. 37)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/1, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/1, paragraph 5)
2. Representation alleging non-observance by Cameroon of the Right of Association (Agriculture) Convention, 1921 (No. 11), the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98), the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111) and the Termination of Employment Convention, 1982 (No. 158)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/2, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was not receivable.
(GB.340/INS/19/2, paragraph 5)
3. Representation alleging non-observance by Tunisia of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/3, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/3, paragraph 5)
4. Representation alleging non-observance by Argentina of the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155) and the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/4, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/4, paragraph 5)
5. Representation alleging non-observance by Peru of the Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919 (No. 1)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/5, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/5, paragraph 5)
6. Representation alleging non-observance by Mexico of the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/6, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/6, paragraph 5)
7. Representation alleging non-observance by Peru of the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111), the Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention, 1981 (No. 156) and the Safety and Health in Mines Convention, 1995 (No. 176)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/7, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/7, paragraph 5)
8. Representation alleging non-observance by Portugal of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129), and the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/8, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/8, paragraph 5)
9. Follow-up to the representation alleging non-observance by Chile of the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)
In light of the information provided in document GB.340/INS/19/9 and on the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided to:
(a) postpone once again the appointment of the committee charged with examining the new representation pending further examination by the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (CEACR) at its 91st Session (November–December 2020) of the follow-up given to the recommendations previously adopted by the Governing Body; and
(b) consider the appointment of a tripartite committee at its 341st Session (March 2021).
(GB.340/INS/19/9, paragraph 9)
10. Representation alleging non-observance by Portugal of the Nursing Personnel Convention, 1977 (No. 149)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/10, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/10, paragraph 5)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/1, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/1, paragraph 5)
2. Representation alleging non-observance by Cameroon of the Right of Association (Agriculture) Convention, 1921 (No. 11), the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98), the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111) and the Termination of Employment Convention, 1982 (No. 158)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/2, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was not receivable.
(GB.340/INS/19/2, paragraph 5)
3. Representation alleging non-observance by Tunisia of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/3, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/3, paragraph 5)
4. Representation alleging non-observance by Argentina of the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155) and the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/4, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/4, paragraph 5)
5. Representation alleging non-observance by Peru of the Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919 (No. 1)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/5, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/5, paragraph 5)
6. Representation alleging non-observance by Mexico of the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/6, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/6, paragraph 5)
7. Representation alleging non-observance by Peru of the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111), the Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention, 1981 (No. 156) and the Safety and Health in Mines Convention, 1995 (No. 176)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/7, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/7, paragraph 5)
8. Representation alleging non-observance by Portugal of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129), and the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/8, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/8, paragraph 5)
9. Follow-up to the representation alleging non-observance by Chile of the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)
In light of the information provided in document GB.340/INS/19/9 and on the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided to:
(a) postpone once again the appointment of the committee charged with examining the new representation pending further examination by the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (CEACR) at its 91st Session (November–December 2020) of the follow-up given to the recommendations previously adopted by the Governing Body; and
(b) consider the appointment of a tripartite committee at its 341st Session (March 2021).
(GB.340/INS/19/9, paragraph 9)
10. Representation alleging non-observance by Portugal of the Nursing Personnel Convention, 1977 (No. 149)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.340/INS/19/10, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.340/INS/19/10, paragraph 5)